Fewer change orders
Discrepancies in capacities, power supply and media are found in the design, where fixing them takes hours, not weeks on site.
Service
Fix design errors in the design, not on site.
Independent AI review of the design across all disciplines before the contractor is selected. Every finding is verified by a Capitanier specialist. You receive a report with references to drawing and page and a priority based on cost and schedule impact.
Who it is forDevelopers and investors before tenderProject managers reviewing the designBuilding managers taking a project into operation
What you get
A result, not a list of features.
A more reliable tender
A unified equipment list across disciplines is a basis that can be priced without guesswork.
Shorter commissioning
What is right in the design does not need finishing at the end of construction.
What we check
What exactly it does.
- Devices without power supply or control: every device must have a panel it is fed from and a system that controls it.
- Parameter discrepancies between disciplines: capacities, currents, voltage systems, temperature differentials, flow rates. Tolerance 10 %, voltage system exact match.
- Missing temperatures, currents, voltages and flow rates according to standardised equipment templates.
- Missing data links to PLC, BMS and IoT: communication interfaces, protocols, points.
- Impact of design revisions and changes on equipment, panels, PLC and BMS.
How the review works
Four steps, no surprises.
Document handover
Drawings, technical reports, specifications and bills of quantities of all disciplines. PDF including scans, DOCX, XLSX.
AI analysis across disciplines
Comparison of MEP, power, controls and low-voltage systems. We read tables by column, the way they carry meaning.
Engineer verification
Every finding is confirmed by a Capitanier specialist. Nothing leaves without a human signature.
Findings report
DOCX with references to drawing and page, priority by impact and a unified equipment list. You work through the findings step by step with the agent.
Example findings from a real project (anonymised)
This is what a review report looks like.
FindingSource ASource BPriority
AHU cooling coil capacity
HVAC specification14,6 kW
Cooling diagram30 kW
HighDifference above tolerance. Affects the valve, pump and chiller.
Heating water temperature differential
Specification60/30 °C
Heating diagram70/40 °C
MediumThree different differentials in three documents. The valid one must be determined.
Unit without a heat source
Specificationunit 9.01
Heating and cooling diagramsmissing
HighNot even a pump in the supplier's offer.
Hotel project, Czech Republic. Data is anonymised; the project and investor are not named.
Connects to
One register, more modules.
Frequently asked questions
The most frequent questions.
When is the best time for a review?+
At the building permit stage, at tender documentation, at detailed design and at every major revision. The earlier, the cheaper the fix.
Which formats do you accept?+
PDF including scans, DOCX, XLSX. DWG by arrangement.
Does it replace the BIM coordinator?+
No, it complements them. The review works with 2D documentation, tables and technical reports, which are often not in the BIM model.
How much does it cost and how long does it take?+
The review is included in every plan – Crew, Captain and Fleet; the scope is set by the number of credits in the plan. You receive the result by the agreed deadline, typically within a few working days depending on the volume of documentation.
Next step
Send us one project
You receive a findings report and a unified equipment list. No card, no commitment.